Our Results

• Accident- Passenger in Motor Vehicle

  Passenger sustained significant injuries as a result of a traffic accident and was required to remain hospitalized for several weeks. Parties settled before trial for $275,000.00.

• Murder for Hire Trial

  Attorney Lynch just completed a murder trial in federal court. This particular case stemmed from a cold case and involved a very unique and complex set of factors requiring an experienced defense team.

• Frank Danzo v. Strait-Flex International, Inc.- Breach of Contract and Wrongful Discharge lawsuit against Strait-Flex International, Inc

  Attorney Lynch successfully represented the Defendant-Corporation. Jury returned a defense verdict, finding in favor of Strait-Flex International, Inc. and therefore no contract and no breach. The wrongful discharge was withdrawn by Plaintiff at the close of his evidence.

• Personal Injury Case

  Attorney Lynch recently settled a significant six-figure accident claim wherein the client suffered severe injuries as the result of an impaired driver. Attorney Lynch was able to successfully negotiate a settlement that truly represented the scope and nature of his client's injuries.

• United States v. Konstadinos Tsaras/ State of Missouri v. Konstadinos Tsaras

  Attorney Lynch represented this particular client, a Greek national, who was charged with multiple state and federal offenses related to the unauthorized use of prohibited software and download(s)- an internet crime. Attorney Lynch was referred this matter by another law firm after the client retained separate counsel, who was unable to appropriately handle this complex issue. Ultimately, the client was charged in both jurisdictions and faced a potential prison term of in excess of 10 to 15 years, including a mandatory minimum prison sentence in federal court. While maintaining contact with the Greek Consulate in Chicago, Attorney Lynch entered and represented the client in both courts, AVOIDED the mandatory minimum through the DISMISSAL of the majority of charges, and successfully resolved this matter with a low sentence. The client is expecting release within one year.

• United States v. Diane Hegger

  Defendant charged with possession of pseudoephedrine knowing same would be used to manufacture methamphetamine (pill shopping). Facing a presumptive guidelines range/term of imprisonment of 87 to 108 months, Attorney Lynch successfully urged the Court to use a 70 to 87 month starting point from which he as able to obtain a sentence of PROBATION for his client.

• United States v. Elbert Ellis

  Charged with a federal gun crime- felon in possession, Attorney Lynch brought this case to trial on two separate occasions, each resulting in a hung jury. Unable to secure a conviction, the Government moved to dismiss this case with prejudice.

• State of Missouri v. Andrew Prize

  Charged with a second offense DWI, Defendant was found NOT GUILTY following a trial wherein the State was unable to prove Defendant was operating the vehicle in question or when Defendant would have been intoxicated. Highlighting inconsistencies in the 2389 Alcohol Influence Report, as well as other facts suggesting Defendant was not operating the motor vehicle at the time of his arrest, Attorney Lynch was able to secure the not guilty verdict. Congratulations to Andrew Prize!

• United States v. Elizabeth Reeds

  Charged with possession of pseudoephedrine, knowing same would be used to manufacture methamphetamine, client was facing a term of imprisonment of between 37 to 46 months. Following arguments at sentencing, Attorney John Lynch was able to successfully urge the Court to impose a sentence of PROBATION.

• United States v. Tonya Kernebeck

  Another Defendant charged with possession of pseudoephedrine knowing same would be used to manufacture methamphetamine (pill shopping). Facing a presumptive guidelines range/term of imprisonment of 87 to 108 months, Attorney Lynch successfully urged the Court to use a 70 to 87 month starting point. Following successful argument from Attorney Lynch regarding Defendant's rehabilitative efforts, as well as other personal factors, the Court imposed a term of PROBATION.

• State of Missouri v. Katherine Taylor

  Defendant was charged with Felony Possession of Cocaine, Drug Paraphernalia, and Marijuana. Following a series of hearings, submission of certain pertinent motions and successful argument to the prosecuting attorney, Attorney Lynch was able to show that Defendant was not actually in possession of any narcotic or apparatus used to ingest a narcotics such that she could not be prosecuted. Accordingly, the prosecuting attorney DISMISSED all counts based on Attorney Lynch's representations regarding the merits of the case.